Home›Library
1,217 Supreme Court decisions, resolutions, and opinions from 1901 to today. Filter and sort to narrow down.
Factual findings of trial and appellate courts that are well-supported by the evidence on record are binding on this Court. This is a Petition for Review 1 under Rule 45 assailing the December 21, 2005 Decision, 2 as well as the July 18, 2006 Resolution 3 in CA-G.R. CV No. 55205.
Before the Court is the Very Urgent Motion for Reconsideration of Jaime M. Robles (Robles) seeking to set aside this Court's Decision dated December 4, 2009 which nullified the April 16, 2002 Decision of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 57417 and the February 27, 2007
The Court of Appeals having affirmed the decision 1 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of San Mateo, Rizal, Branch 76 convicting Jun-jun Asuela (appellant) of Slight Physical Injuries in Criminal Case No. 3365, and of Murder in Criminal Case No. 3366, appellant lodged the present
This is an appeal from the September 30, 2008 Decision 1 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR-H.C. No. 02135 entitled People of the Philippines v. Ricky Alfredo y Norman , which affirmed an earlier decision 2 in Criminal Case Nos. 01-CR-4213 and 01-CR-4214of the Regional Tr
Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari of the Decision 1 dated September 24, 2001 of the Court Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 63197, affirming in toto the Decision 2 dated May 6, 1998 of the Department of Agrarian Reform Adjudication Board (DARAB) in DARAB Case Nos. 5
By Affidavit-Complaint 1 dated February 20, 2009, Donnabelle D. Ruben (complainant), Clerk IV of the Office of the Clerk of Court (OCC), Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, charged Ramil L. Abon (respondent), Utility Worker I of the same office, with conduct u
For review is the Decision 1 dated June 30, 2004 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 56587 which affirmed the Decision 2 dated January 3, 1996 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Makati City, Branch 137 in Civil Case No. 93-2328. The facts follow: Sometime in April 19
This a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court with application for temporary restraining order and/or writ of preliminary injunction seeking to set aside the Resolution 1 dated July 20, 2005 as well as its related Resolution 2 dated May 22, 2006 of
For review is the Decision 1 of the Court of Appeals dated February 28, 2006, which affirmed with modification the Decision 2 rendered by the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 275, Las Piñas City, in Criminal Case No. 98-1079, finding accused-appellant Rene Celocelo (Celocelo) g
Before us is a Petition for review on certiorari filed under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court. The Petition seeks to reverse the Decision 1 dated 24 December 2008 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in C.A. G.R. SP No. 99242. The CA Decision affirmed the Decision 2 dated 24 August
This case is about the need for the prosecution to show proof that the integrity of seized prohibited drugs has been preserved from the moment of seizure to the moment they are presented in court. The prosecution evidence shows that the Drug Enforcement Group of the Olongapo City
This petition for review 1 assails the 9 May 2007 Decision 2 of the Court of Tax Appeals in C.T.A. EB No. 193, affirming the 5 October 2005 Decision of the Central Board of Assessment Appeals (CBAA) in CBAA Case No. L-33. The CBAA dismissed the appeal of petitioner Philippine Fis
This petition for review 1 assails the 21 June 2007 Decision 2 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 84522. The Court of Appeals affirmed with modification the 11 January 2005 Decision 3 of the Regional Trial Court, National Capital Judicial Region, Branch 167, Pasig City. Th
This resolves the petition for review 1 of the rulings 2 of the Court of Appeals absolving respondent Medicard Philippines, Inc. from liability for reinstatement wages in an illegal dismissal suit. In June 1990, respondent Medicard Philippines, Inc. (respondent), a health mainten
Angel N. Pascual Jr. died intestate on January 2, 1999 leaving as heirs his siblings, namely: petitioner Amelia P. Arellano who is represented by her daughters 1 Agnes P. Arellano (Agnes) and Nona P. Arellano, and respondents Francisco Pascual and Miguel N. Pascual. 2 In a petiti
At bar is a Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, seeking the reversal of the September 28, 2007 Decision 1 and the December 17, 2007 Resolution 2 of the Court of Appeals (CA). The assailed issuances affirmed the January 14, 2000 Order 3 of the Re
In this Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45, petitioners seek the reversal of the Decision 1 dated September 28, 2007 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 98054, which reversed and set aside the Resolutions dated October 9, 2006 2 and December 14, 2006 3 of
Before the Court is a petition for review on certiorari seeking to annul and set aside the Decision 1 dated January 12, 2005 and Resolution 2 dated February 13, 2006 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 70009. The assailed Decision set aside the Joint Orders 3 dated Jun
This is a petition for review 1 with application for the immediate issuance of a temporary restraining order and writ of preliminary injunction assailing the 5 October 2006 Decision 2 and the 23 January 2007 Resolution 3 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 75855. The 5 Octo
This petition for review 1 assails the 8 February 2006 Decision 2 and the 29 May 2006 Resolution 3 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 90212. The Court of Appeals affirmed the 29 June 1998 Decision and the 7 December 2004 Resolution of the Department of Agrarian Reform Adju
